一个很简单的GC测试，但是没有打印出预期的效果。JDK1.8.0_131,JVM参数如下:
-Xmx50m -Xms50m -Xmn8m -XX:SurvivorRatio=2 -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGC
public static void main(String[] args) {
Object[] list = new Object[10];
for(int i=0; i<10 ; i++) {
System.out.println(">>>>>>>>>>" + i);
list[i] = new byte[3*1024*1024];
}
}
console打印如下:
>>>>>>>>>>0
>>>>>>>>>>1
>>>>>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>>>>3
>>>>>>>>>>4
>>>>>>>>>>5
>>>>>>>>>>6
>>>>>>>>>>7
>>>>>>>>>>8
>>>>>>>>>>9
Heap
PSYoungGen total 6144K, used 2139K [0x00000000ff800000, 0x0000000100000000, 0x0000000100000000)
eden space 4096K, 52% used [0x00000000ff800000,0x00000000ffa16fa0,0x00000000ffc00000)
from space 2048K, 0% used [0x00000000ffe00000,0x00000000ffe00000,0x0000000100000000)
to space 2048K, 0% used [0x00000000ffc00000,0x00000000ffc00000,0x00000000ffe00000)
ParOldGen total 43008K, used 30720K [0x00000000fce00000, 0x00000000ff800000, 0x00000000ff800000)
object space 43008K, 71% used [0x00000000fce00000,0x00000000fec000a0,0x00000000ff800000)
Metaspace used 3498K, capacity 4498K, committed 4864K, reserved 1056768K
class space used 387K, capacity 390K, committed 512K, reserved 1048576K
虽然最终看到对象进入了老年代，但是Minor GC的过程都没有打印出来，如果将new byte[3*1024*1024] 改为 new byte[1*1024*1024]，即如下如所示:
public static void main(String[] args) {
Object[] list = new Object[10];
for(int i=0; i<10 ; i++) {
System.out.println(">>>>>>>>>>" + i);
list[i] = new byte[1*1024*1024];
}
}
console打印如下:
>>>>>>>>>>0
>>>>>>>>>>1
[GC (Allocation Failure) [PSYoungGen: 3081K->1896K(6144K)] 3081K->1904K(49152K), 0.0014582 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.00 secs]
>>>>>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>>>>3
>>>>>>>>>>4
[GC (Allocation Failure) [PSYoungGen: 5087K->1864K(6144K)] 5095K->4944K(49152K), 0.0017647 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.00 secs]
>>>>>>>>>>5
>>>>>>>>>>6
>>>>>>>>>>7
[GC (Allocation Failure) [PSYoungGen: 5124K->1784K(6144K)] 8204K->7936K(49152K), 0.0012156 secs] [Times: user=0.00 sys=0.00, real=0.00 secs]
>>>>>>>>>>8
>>>>>>>>>>9
Heap
PSYoungGen total 6144K, used 5009K [0x00000000ff800000, 0x0000000100000000, 0x0000000100000000)
eden space 4096K, 78% used [0x00000000ff800000,0x00000000ffb26620,0x00000000ffc00000)
from space 2048K, 87% used [0x00000000ffc00000,0x00000000ffdbe040,0x00000000ffe00000)
to space 2048K, 0% used [0x00000000ffe00000,0x00000000ffe00000,0x0000000100000000)
ParOldGen total 43008K, used 6152K [0x00000000fce00000, 0x00000000ff800000, 0x00000000ff800000)
object space 43008K, 14% used [0x00000000fce00000,0x00000000fd402060,0x00000000ff800000)
Metaspace used 3495K, capacity 4498K, committed 4864K, reserved 1056768K
class space used 387K, capacity 390K, committed 512K, reserved 1048576K
可以看到有清楚的Minor GC的过程，这是为什么呢？是JVM对这种大对象做了优化以至于直接分配至老年代了吗？
添加回答
举报
0/150
提交
取消